November 12

[On November 12, 1785, while serving as Minister to France, I wrote from Paris to William Wenman Seward, an author acting on behalf of the associated company of Irish merchants in London, to champion the natural economic and cultural ties binding Ireland and America. I argued that Ireland's excellent, affordable manufactures and geographical proximity entitle her to a distinguished share of American trade, though I confessed my ignorance regarding British maritime obstructions or why the merchants would prefer Ostend over the French free port of L'Orient to bypass potential British naval blockades. This exchange exposes my strategic maneuvering to split the British Empire from within by extending a separate economic olive branch to Ireland, signaling that while America will fiercely retaliate against English trade shackles, we deeply desire to exempt the Irish from our commercial warfare.]

I received the honor of your letter of the 25th ult., written by desire of the associated company of Irish merchants, in London, and return you thanks for the kind congratulations you express therein. The freedom of commerce between Ireland and America is undoubtedly very interesting to both countries. If fair play be given to the natural advantages of Ireland, she must come in for a distinguished share of that commerce. She is entitled to it, from the excellence of some of her manufactures, the cheapness of most of them, their correspondence with the American taste, a sameness of language, laws and manners, a reciprocal affection between the people, and the singular circumstance of her being the nearest European land to the United States. I am not at present so well acquainted with the trammels of Irish commerce, as to know what they are, particularly, which obstruct the intercourse between Ireland and America; nor, therefore, what can be the object of a fleet stationed in the western ocean, to intercept that intercourse. Experience, however, has taught us to infer that the fact is probable, because it is impolitic.

On the supposition that this interruption will take place, you suggest Ostend as a convenient entrepôt for the commerce between America and Ireland. Here, too, I find myself, on account of the same ignorance of your commercial regulations, at a loss to say why this is preferable to L'Orient, which, you know, is a free port and in great latitude, which is nearer to both parties, and accessible by a less dangerous navigation. I make no doubt, however, that the reasons of the preference are good. You find by this essay, that I am not likely to be a very instructive correspondent; you shall find me, however, zealous in whatever may concern the interests of the two countries. The system, into which the United States wished to go, was that of freeing commerce from every shackle. A contrary conduct in Great Britain will occasion them to adopt the contrary system, at least as to that island. I am sure they would be glad, if it should be found practicable, to make that discrimination between Great Britain and Ireland, which their commercial principles, and their affection for the latter, would dictate.